Anyway, I listened to their new albums for the first time today so that's the way it's going to be. First impressions, I liked Crystal Castles (the album) better than H&LA (also the album.) H&LA is put together, refined, and within a proper musical structure. I don't mean this to sound pejorative, but it is certainly more conventional than Crystal Castles. Depending on a person's mood, this can definitely be a good thing. Chaotic spasms of electronic screeches might not be everyone's thing. However, listening to the albums back to back, I definitely found myself in a more anarchic mood.
Whereas nearly every instrument on H&LA sounds real, like a contemporary jazz album; the vocals are clear and
skillfully sung (despite any inherent distaste I hold for Antony Hegarty), Crystal Castles sounds like the soundtrack for a video game based on Daydream Nation - the singing mostly consists of Kim Gordon style yells and the synth has a tendency to go on for extended journeys away from the main beat. That said, both are excellent albums that I would definitely recommend, but consider your state of mind first. H&LA is order, Crystal Castles is anarchy. There's probably terminology within the electronic music community which I don't possess to more precisely describe what I'm trying to say. But both will make you want to dance anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment